Wealth & Risk Management Blog

William Byrnes (Texas A&M) tax & compliance articles

Compliance at Wealth Management Firms: Threats to Profitability or an Opportunity to Restore Confidence?

Posted by William Byrnes on August 3, 2009


Financial service providers are required by the provisions of the USA Patriot Act to make substantial investments in technology (though many in the industry have questioned the effectiveness of these investments in preventing the funding of terrorist groups or other nefarious activities).[1]  Senior banking management perceives rising and unpredictable compliance costs that undermine global competitiveness as the most significant threats to the future growth of banking.[2] 

Based on the survey of Miami banks significantly engaged in international banking, staffing costs rose to 271 full-time employees of anti-terrorism/anti-money laundering compliance for approximately $25 million in 2005.  The average survey respondents indicated that it devoted 2.9 FTE employment positions to BSA/AML compliance in 2002 versus 6.8 FTE positions in 2005. The number of full-time employees devoted to compliance represented 9% of the workforce in 2005.  Staff resources devoted to compliance increased by 160% between 2002 and 2005.

The results have been that Miami’s banking industry has been characterized by contraction.  The number of foreign bank agencies operating in Florida fell from 38 in 2000 to 31 in 2005, of which 7 did not book any deposits.  There were 10 Edge Act banks operating in Florida in 2000, but only 7 in 2005.  The number of international banking employees (in foreign agencies, Edge Acts and the international divisions of domestic banks chartered in Florida) declined from 4,660 in 2000 to 3,027 in 2005.

While the cost of AML compliance increased around 71% in North America between 2004 and 2007, it rose 58% globally.[3]  By example, in 2003, the UK’s FSA’s Anti-Money Laundering Current Customer Review Cost Benefit Analysis estimated the implementation costs of the AML regime to firms at 152 million pounds sterling, substantial by European standards though paltry by America’s.

In a 2006 Economist Intelligence Unit survey, international senior bank executives were asked about the costs of compliance of government regulation. When asked what changes they expected in the regulatory environment over the coming three to five year, over 91% stated that they expected regulations affecting their institution to grow in complexity and breadth, 88% stated that compliance with industry regulations will become more onerous, and 81% reported that they expect penalties for non-compliance to increase in severity.

On the other hand, perhaps more (or more effective implementation of current) compliance and its resulting governance would have protected against or softened the blow of the systemic iceberg as well as protected against or softened the blow of the most recent investment fraud scandals.  And UBS’ level of compliance expenditure neither deterred its activity regarding 52,000[4] USA non-complaint persons, nor its substantial investments in US mortgages leading to write-downs requiring a Swiss government substantial investment to shore up its capital.  Certainly, based on the G7 and G20 meetings, as well as the discussions at the World Economic Forum, levels of compliance expenditure, compliance education, and governance will be required to be increased in order to restore institutional confidence.[5] 

Based upon HNWI clients moving away from opaque investment firms toward transparent ones, there may be an opportunity for Chartered Wealth Managers advisors members / firms to market to stung HNWIs not just as well rounded advisors, but as trustable compliance and governance oriented advisors, collaborating transparently regarding developing the HNWIs portfolio of opportunities.

Information Tools

Besides the army of lawyers advising regulated firms and the chartered accountants undertaking compliance, anti-fraud, AML, terrorist activity, and qualified intermediary (QI) audits, near and dear to myself, the publications market employment is continuing to grow.  Because compliance regulations, costs, and penalties are growing more onerous, all regulated financial service providers and their advisors must purchase some information resource to address the variety of compliance issues encountered regularly. 

Moreover, to undertake the role of the ‘trusted advisor’, a sophisticated wealth manager must have a bundle of reliable resources enabling the holistic, international, business partner approach that modern HNWIs and UHNWIs now demand.  By example of such information bundle for Chartered Wealth Managers, see the soon to be released online and print version of International Trust & Company Laws, Analysis, and Tax Planning.

Indication of this trend is that the legal, tax and regulatory publishing market has been and is growing consistently.  Legal publishing is the largest segment in professional publishing, accounting for approximately 36% of the total market. In 2007, legal publishing revenue was about $10 billion, up 7.5% from $9.3 billion in 2006 and 14.9% from $8.7 billion in 2005. [6] Legal publishers are sparking growth by developing digital tools and software out of their reference book and journal content designed to make it easier for legal professionals to find information and automate mundane tasks. 

New online publishing will use mind-mapping technology to educate users about holistic connections amongst ideas, issues, and strategies.  Growth in publishing for an industry tends to indicate growth in that industry.  By example of such new multimedia information resources see pilot projects as follows:

AML sample: http://amlsample.googlepages.com/

US tax sample: http://cmsove.googlepages.com/  

Prof. William Byrnes (www.llmprogram.org)


[1] Standard and Poor’s Industry Surveys: Banking (Dec. 6, 2007).

[2] The Washington Economics Group, The Economic Impacts of International Banking in Florida and Industry Survey: 2005.

[3] KPMG’s Global Anti-Money Laundering Survey 2007.

[4] Agreement was reached between the US and Swiss governments July 31, 2009 for UBS to turn over of the 52,000 names to the IRS.  See Wall Street Journal US State Dept: US Pleased, Relieved About UBS Deal July 31, 2009.

[5] See The Future Of Global Financial System, World Economic Forum World Scenario Series (2009) at 22.

[6] Simba Information, Global Legal & Business Publishing 2007-2008 (2007).

One Response to “Compliance at Wealth Management Firms: Threats to Profitability or an Opportunity to Restore Confidence?”

  1. utettisurcigh said

    Hopefully…
    —————————————
    signature: pulmicort

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: