Senate Hearing recorded for streaming: U.S. Tax Code: Love It, Leave It or Reform It!
Posted by William Byrnes on July 24, 2014
The U.S. Tax Code: Love It, Leave It or Reform It!
JCT Report: Present Law And Background Related To Proposals To Reform The Taxation Of Income Of Multinational Enterprises
Watch the recorded hearing’s webcast (link via Logo above)
Wyden Statement on Corporate Inversions and the Need for Comprehensive Tax Reform (excerpt):
The U.S. tax code is infected with the chronic diseases of loopholes and inefficiency. These infections are hobbling America’s drive to create more good-wage, red, white and blue jobs here at home. They are a significant drag on the economy and are harming U.S. competitiveness. The latest outbreak of this contagion is the growing wave of corporate inversions, where American companies move their headquarters out of the U.S. in pursuit of lower tax rates.
The inversion virus now seems to be multiplying every few days. Medtronic, Mylan, Mallinckrodt and many more deals have either occurred recently or are currently in the works. Medtronic’s proposed $42 billion merger with Covidien was record-breaking when it was announced in June. But the ink in the record books had barely dried when AbbVie announced its intention on Friday to acquire Shire for almost $55 billion. According to the July 15th edition of Marketplace, “What’s going on now is a feeding frenzy … Every investment banker now has a slide deck that they’re taking to any possible company and saying, ‘you have to do a corporate inversion now, because if you don’t, your competitors will.’”
Over the past few months, we’ve seen a handful of legislative proposals to address the issue of inversions. Most of them are punitive and retroactive. Rather than incentivizing American companies to remain in the U.S., these bills would build walls around U.S. corporations in order to keep them from inverting. …
Hatch Statement at Finance Committee Hearing on International Taxation (excerpt):
For example, in 2013, the OECD launched its Base Erosion & Profit Shifting, or BEPS, project. While we appreciate the OECD’s efforts in bringing tax authorities together to discuss and work through issues, many of us have expressed concern that the BEPS project could be used by other countries as a way to increase taxes on American taxpayers. ….
This approach, in my view, completely misses the mark.
While it may put a stop to traditional inversions it could actually lead to more reverse acquisition inversions as our U.S. multinationals would, under this approach, become more attractive acquisition targets for foreign corporations.
Whether it is traditional corporate acquisition inversion or a reverse acquisition inversion, the result is the same: continued stripping of the U.S. tax base. …
Ron Wyden (D-OR)
William Byrnes' Tax, Wealth, and Risk Intelligence 
Deborah Lagutaris said
I am confused. If I were making a billion dollars a year, I would be willing to pay forward for the infrastructure that allowed to achieve such success. I would pay at the rate of 25% and be happy to do it. Anyone can live on $750 Million Dollarsa year. Rather, it seems that …um… people don’t have any gratitude for the gifts that our parents and grandparents paid for. Gifts such as modern electrical, gas, and water delivery systems; an educational system and highway system, all the envy of the world. Thank the weakness of other national economies for the boons we received in the 1950s and 60s. The U.S. has to build other markets to retain its hegemony as the de facto world currency. That’s what the Marshall Plan was all about: resurrecting markets for American goods. Other benefits were mere byblow at the time, as far as the policymakers were concerned.
LikeLike